Supreme Court fails to unmask leak after months-long probe https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/012023_scotus_leak_report/supreme-court-fails-unmask-leak-after-months-long-probe/
The Supreme Court reported that it has been unable to identify a culprit behind the biggest leak in its history, a draft of the landmark ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
#Tucson #Arizona
No equal treatment. 🙊 Judges of SC versus their employees.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/21/us/supreme-court-investigation.html
While noting that 97 workers had been formally interviewed, the report did not say whether the justices or their spouses had been.
A day later, the court was forced to issue a second statement saying that the marshal had in fact conferred with the justices, but on very different terms from others at the institution. Lower-level employees had been formally interrogated, ...
@TucsonSentinel
Some more.
https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/121222_scotus_congress_rights_fight/supreme-court-left-cold-as-congress-takes-up-mantle-uphold-rights160/
The court’s response — was, essentially, Alito said he didn’t do it, so there’s nothing to see here. While the court may think that settles it, court watchers certainly don’t think so.
“Everything you hear from the legal counsel or from the court itself is defensive, and it looks as if there in a values-free zone where ethics applies to others but not them, That's not going to restore the legitimacy of the court.”